The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence after she pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. The court held that the officer who pulled the defendant over had reasonable suspicion to extend the stop for a canine sniff where the government offered several specific facts in support of reasonable suspicion. In this case, among other things, the defendant was pulled over in a well-known drug-trafficking corridor, she drove a truck registered in someone else’s name, she took unusual measures to protect the truck, she offered inconsistent and implausible stories about the purpose of her travel, and she had a conviction for possession of meth. The court also held that defendant was not entitled to Miranda warnings during the routine traffic stop.

To read or download the full decision CLICK HERE